For citation purposes: Azoz MEH, Omer NE. Idiopathic tumoral calcinosis: The question of the cause is still not answered. OA Case Reports 2014 Apr 19;3(4):31.

Case report

 
Pathology

Idiopathic tumoral calcinosis: The question of the cause is still not answered.

M Azoz1, N Omer2*
 

Authors affiliations

(1) Department of Surgery ,Kosti teaching Hospital, Kosti, White Nile, Sudan .

(2) Department of pathology, Faculty of Medicine ,AL imam Al mahdi university.kosti,white Nile,Sudan.

* Corresponding author Email: gelas3@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction

Idiopathic tumoural calcinosis is a rare disorder, characterized by tumour like periarticular deposit of calcium around the joints and the exact cause of this disease is still unknown. In this report we describe a case of primary idiopathic Tumoural calcinosis in a 17 years old female.

Case report

The patient was treated with surgical resection of the mass without recurrence at 5 years follow up, and this highlights the importance of complete surgical resection to prevent recurrence which is common following incomplete resections.

Conclusion

Complete surgical resection is effective in treatment of primary idiopathic Tumoural Calcinosis.

Introduction

Tumoural calcinosis is a rare disorder[1], in the literature it has been reported under various names such as calcifying bursitis, calcifying collagenolysis and kikuyu[2], it was first reported by Duret[3] in 1899 as endotheliome calcifie then described by Teustschlaender[4] as lipocalcinogranulomatosis in 1935; the term tumoural calcinosis was introduced by Inclan[5] in 1943 and it is the most common term. It is characterized by tumour like periarticular deposits of calcium, most commonly around large joints such as the hip, shoulder and elbow[6]. The exact pathogenesis of Tumoural calcinosis (especially the idiopathic one) is still obscure and a matter of speculation[2,7,8]; although factors like trauma and chronic pressure have been suggested as triggering factors[9,10,11]. Tumoral calcinosis is subdivided into:

a) primary type with no associated disease.

b) secondary type that follows other disorders such as renal failure, hyperparathyroidism, psedoxanthoma elasticum, sarcoidosis, scleroderma, hypervitaminosis D, milk-alkali syndrome and osteolysis10.

Then primary type has been sub classified into:

1) normophosphatemic (idiopathic)(serum concentrations of calcium and phosphate usually normal).

2) hyperphosphatemic type (serum calcium is normal but the phosphate concentration is raised).

The primary Tumoural calcinosis is the most common type2. The primary hyperphosphatemic type is described as familial type and it has both autosomal dominant and recessive patterns of inheritance[12]; it has been found to result from mutations in the GALNT3 and KLOTHO gene that leads to inactivation of FGF23 which encodes a potent phosphaturic protein[13,14].

Clinically patients usually present with asymptomatic, single or multiple, unilateral or bilateral, firm swellings over the hip, shoulder, elbow, and knee joints; rarely wrist, hands, ankle, scalp, eyelid and feet are involved[15]. Progressive growth and enlargement of a calcified mass can be associated with pain, functional impairment and nerve compression, long standing lesion may lead to skin ulceration, sinus tracks with chalky milk like drainage and chronic infection with secondary amyloidosis[2]; typically there is no bone involvement, although periosteal reaction or erosion due to pressure may sometimes occur. The disorder has been reported in all age groups including infants[1,16], it is more common in black Africans[1]. Tumoural calcinosis should come in the differential diagnosis of subcutaneous hard mass near a joint, Primary Tumoural calcinosis can be differentiated from secondary Tumoural calcinosis with careful patient's history and laboratory evaluation. Harkess et al.[17] suggest the following criteria for diagnosing of primary (idiopathic) Tumoural calcinosis:

- The presence of large, painless, calcified masses in juxta-articular sites, particularly around the elbows and hips.

- The absence of abnormal values of serum calcium or phosphorus.

- No associated renal disease, metabolic disorder, or collagen disease.

- The disease manifesting itself before the age of twenty.

- Evidence of familial or racial predisposition.

- Recurrence of the lesion particularly after incomplete excision.

The differential diagnosis of tumour- like lesions around the joint include osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma and mycetoma[15], an x-ray finding called (chicken wire) which is characteristic for Tumoural calcinosis[18,19,20] can be used to identify it, but histological examination is required for the definitive diagnosis and histological features as described in Inclan et al.[5] are multiple cysts filled with calcified deposits lined by histiocytes, giant cells and xanthomatous histiocytes.

Surgical excision is the general recommendation for treatment[16,21,22]. Other methods of treatment have been described including medication with antacid, limitation of calcium and phosphate[23]; partial parathyroidectomy is recommended as the therapeutic option for Tumoural calcinosis that associate renal osteodystrophy[24]. The aim of this article is to report a case of Tumoral Calcinosis which is a rare disease with obscure cause and to emphasis the surgical resection as good method of management.

Case report

A 17 year old female presented with a hard swelling in the gluteal region around the right hip joint of one year duration. It started as a small swelling and gradually increased in size until it became a larger one. The patient experienced a pin prick sensation on the site of swelling which increased during walking. There was no history of similar conditions among the relatives of the patient and the patient could not recall episodes of trauma or injection over the affected area, excessive milk or antacid intake or any local or systemic illness prior to the development of the lesion. The patient had a history of excision of similar swelling around her left hip joint two years back which was also diagnosed as Tumoural calcinosis.

Physical examination revealed 15cm x10cm mass lateral to the right anterior superior iliac spine with a lot of striae on the skin over it; no sinuses or visible dilated veins. On palpation, the mass was bony hard, slightly tender, not hot and it was immobile with a nodular surface. The mobility of the hip joint was unaffected. The systemic examination was normal.

Her renal profile, serum calcium, phosphate and parathyroid hormones were normal, CBC revealed no abnormality. Plain X- Ray of the right hip showed a calcified lobulated subcutaneous mass around the right hip joint (Figure 1). Excision of the mass was done and the intra- operative finding showed a mass with multiple cysts containing chalky white material (Figure 2) and grossly the mass looks like trabiculated bone (Figure 3). The wound was closed in a single layer without drain. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. The mass was sent for histopathology which confirmed the diagnosis of Tumoural calcinosis. There was no recurrence at 5 years follow up.

Plain X- Ray of the right hip shows calcified lobulated subcutaneous mass around the right hip joint.

Intra- operative the mass shows multiple cysts containing chalky white material.

Gross appearance of the mass after removal.

Discussion

Primary (idiopathic) Tumoural calcinosis can be differentiated from secondary Tumoural calcinosis with careful patient's history which is usually negative for conditions that associate secondary Tumoural calcinosis and with laboratory evaluation which shows normal serum calcium and phosphate levels, and in fact our case fulfils all criteria that are required for diagnosing Tumoural calcinosis[17], although currently any calcium deposit like tumour around a joint is considered Tumoural calcinosis regardless of patient's age, sex or pre-existing disease[2]. Surgical excision is an effective method of treatment in idiopathic Tumoural calcinosis[15,16,22,25]. Complete excision was performed in our patient with no recurrence on five years follow up which highlights the importance of complete removal of the mass since incomplete resection is a risk for recurrence[2,12,22]. Medical treatment with calcitonin, bisphosphonates, steroids and phenylbutazone are ineffective most of the time and recurrence often occurs[2].

Conclusion

Primary idiopathic Tumoural Calcinosis is still a disease of unknown cause but complete surgical resection is an effective method of management of this disese and it prevents recurrence.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Conflict of interests

None declared.

Competing interests

None declared

References

1. Pakasa NM, Kalengayi RM. Tumoral calcinosis: a clinicopathological study of 111 cases with emphasis on the earliest changes. Histopathology. 1997 ;31(1):18-24.

2. Del Bravo V, Liuzza F, Perisano C, Chalidis B, Marzetti E, Colelli P, Maccauro G. Gluteal tumoral calcinosis. Hip Int. 2012 ;22(6):585-91.

3. Duret MH. Tumours multiples et singuliere des bourses (endotheliomes, peutetre d' origine parasitaire) Bull Mem Soc Anat Paris. 1899; 74:725-733.

4. Teutschlaender O. [Zur Kenntnis der progressiven Lipogranulomatose. der Muskulatur]. Virchow Arch (Pathol Anat). 1935; 295:424. German.

5. Inclan A, Leon P, Camejo MG (1943)Tumoral calcinosis. JAMA121:490-5.

6. Möckel G, Buttgereit F, Labs K, Perka C. Tumoral calcinosis revisited: pathophysiology and treatment. Rheumatol Int. 2005; 25(1):55-9.

7. Kim HS, Suh JS, Kim YH, Park SH. Tumoral calcinosis of the hand: three unusual cases with painful swelling of small joints. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; 130(4): 548-551.

8. Slavin RE, Wen J, Barmada A. Tumoral calcinosis--a pathogenetic overview: a histological and ultrastructural study with a report of two new cases, one in infancy. Int J Surg Pathol. 2012; 20(5):462-73.

9. Mc Clatchie S, Bremner AD. Tumoral calcinosis: an unrecognized disease. BMJ. 1969; 1:153-155.

10. Smack D, Norton SA, Fitzpatrick JE. Proposal for a pathogenesis-based classification of tumoral calcinosis.Int J Dermatol. 1996; 35:265-271.

11. Slavin RE, Wen J, Kumar D, Evans EB. Familial tumoral calcinosis. A clinical, histopathologic, and ultrastructural study with an analysis of its calcifying process and pathogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993; Aug;17(8):788-802.

12. Lykoudis EG, Seretis K, Ristanis S. Huge recurrent tumoral calcinosis needing extensive excision and reconstruction: report of a rare case and brief literature review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36(5):1194-1197.

13. Topaz O, Shurman DL, Bergman R, Indelman M, Ratajczak P, Mizrachi M, Khamaysi Z, Behar D, Petronius D, Friedman V, Zelikovic I, Raimer S, Metzker A,Richard G, Sprecher E. Mutations in GALNT3, encoding a protein involved in O-linked glycosylation, cause familial tumoral calcinosis. Nat Genet. 2004; 36(6):579-581.

14. Ichikawa S, Imel EA, Kreiter ML, Yu X, Mackenzie DS, Sorenson AH, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, White KE, Econs MJ. A homozygous missense mutation in human KLOTHO causes severe tumoral calcinosis. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(9):2684-2691.

15. Tharini GK, Prabhavathy D, Hema N, Jayakumar S. Idiopathic sporadic tumoral calcinosis in an Indian girl. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011; 77(4):536.

16. Hammoud S, McCarthy EF, Weber K. Tumoral calcinosis in infants: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (436): 261-264.

17. Harkess JW, Peters HJ. Tumoral calcinosis. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967; 49(4):721-731.

18. Steinbach LS, Johnston JO, Tepper EF, Honda GD, Martel W. Tumoral calcinosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 1995; 24(8):573-8.

19. Senol U, Karaal K, Cevikol C, Dincer A. MR imaging findings of recurrent tumoral calcinosis. Clin Imaging. 2000; 24(3):154-156.

20. Domb BG, Tyler W, Ellis S, McCarthy E. Radiographic evaluation of pathological bone lesions: current spectrum of disease and approach to diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A Suppl 2:84-90.

21. Giardina F Sudanese A, Bertoni F, Guerra E, Paderni S. Tumoral calcinosis of the popliteal space. Orthopedics. 2004; 27(10):1104-1107.

22. Noyez JF, Murphree SM, Chen K. Tumoral calcinosis, a clinical report of eleven cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993; 59(3):249-254.

23. Mozaffarian G, Lafferty FW, Pearson OH. Treatment of tumoral calcinosis with phosphorus deprivation. Ann Intern Med. 1972; 77(5):741-5.

24. Cannata-Andia JB, Drueke TB, Cunningham J et al. Clinical algorithms on renal osteodystrophy:report of an expert working group. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15 (Suppl 5):39-57.

25. Shaukat YM, Malik EF, Rashid MA, Cannon SR. Large tumoral calcinosis in the gluteal region: a case report. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2013; 15(5):495-9.

    Licensee to OAPL (UK) 2014. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)
    Keywords