For citation purposes: Nardin C, Fitzpatrick L, Zippin JH. Diverse effects of cAMP signaling in melanoma support the role of distinct cAMP microdomains in melanomagenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. OA Dermatology 2014 Mar 09;2(1):5.

Review

 
Cutaneous Biology

Diverse effects of cAMP signaling in melanoma support the role of distinct cAMP microdomains in melanomagenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy.

C Nardin1, L Fitzpatrick2, J Zippin2*
 

Authors affiliations

(1) Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Besançon, France

(2) Department of Dermatology, Joan and Sanford I.Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, United States of America

* Corresponding author Email: jhzippin@med.cornell.edu

Abstract

Introduction

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a second messenger signalling molecule, present from bacteria to man, involved in many cellular functions. Pathways mediated by cAMP signalling are widespread in the body. cAMP plays a role in both normal physiology and in various diseases such as cancer. In melanoma, cAMP signalling can either activate or inhibit growth thereby leading to conflicting results. In many cases the same cAMP signalling proteins such as melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), protein kinase A (PKA), and phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are involved in both growth stimulation and inhibition begging the question how cAMP can seemingly lead to disparate cellular events in melanoma via the same signalling cascade. Recently, it has become clear that cAMP signals in discrete microdomains capable of responding to distinct upstream signals and, via identical protein machinery, can induce unique cellular events. The complex role of cAMP signalling in melanoma supports an important role for cAMP microdomains in melanoma biology. The aim of this review was to discuss how diverse effects of cAMP signalling in melanoma support the role of distinct cAMP microdomains in melanomagenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy.

Conclusion

Further research is warranted to elucidate the impact of contextual cues and intrinsic cell type differences on the role of cAMP signaling in melanoma, in order to better understand melanomagenesis, metastasis, and resistance and to help identify new therapeutic targets.

Introduction

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a signalling molecule present from bacteria to man. In mammalian cells, there are ten different enzymes called adenylyl cyclases (AC) that produce cAMP from ATP. ADCYs 1-9, transmembrane ACs (tmACs), synthesize cAMP subsequent to ligand binding a seven-transmembrane G protein couple receptor (GPCR). ADCY10, soluble adenylyl cyclase, is not G protein responsive but instead is regulated by calcium, bicarbonate and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). [1,2] Many effector proteins of cAMP have been identified, notably Protein Kinase A (PKA), exchange proteins activated by cAMP (EPAC) and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Pathways mediated by cAMP signalling are widespread in the body, with different functions depending on the location, context and cellular milieu. The pathway is turned off when cAMP is hydrolysed to AMP by a class of enzymes called phosphodiesterases (PDEs), which are expressed in many tissues and cell types.

Mutations affecting cAMP signalling pathways have been implicated in a variety of genetic diseases with associated malignancies and in some cases acquired cancer. For example, inactivating mutations in the PRKRA1A gene on chromosome 17q22-24, which codes for the alpha 1-regulatory subunit of PKA, have been observed in the majority of Carney Complex cases (a hereditary disease characterized by cardiac myxoma, endocrine disorders and skin pigmentation).[3] Activating mutations of the GNAS1 gene, which codes for the Gs alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein, result in constitutive activation of tmACs and are associated with McCune-Albright syndrome (characterized by polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty, and café-au-lait macules).[4] In addition, inactivating mutations of PDEs are associated with both prostate and testicular cancer[5,6] suggesting that these two cancer types are supported by an elevation of cAMP. However, in other cancers with known mutations in cAMP regulatory proteins, the association between cAMP and the development of cancer is less clear. For example, in melanoma, cAMP signalling can be either activated or inhibited with conflicting results. In this review we will discuss the current understanding of cAMP signalling in melanoma (Figure 1).

The role of cAMP in melanoma: promotor and suppressor of melanomagenesis. ATP is converted to cAMP by adenylylcyclases and phosphodiesterases metabolize cAMP to AMP. Activation is shown with green arrows and inhibition with red arrows. PheoM is pheomelanin, EuM is eumelanin, Tyr is tyrosinase, BRAF is the serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf, CRAF is the serine/threonine-protein kinase C-raf, MEK is the extracellular signal-regulated kinase or the mitogen-activated protein kinase and ERK is the extracellular signal-regulated kinase and RAS represents the protein superfamily of small GTPases.

 

Evidence supporting an inhibitory role for cAMP in melanoma

In this section, we will discuss how cAMP inhibits melanoma growth and in concert how loss of cAMP signalling can enhance melanomagenesis. Several cAMP pathway proteins can inhibit melanomagenesis. The first of these is the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that signals through cAMP to mediate melanin synthesis. Strong MC1R activity is associated with the production of black/brown eumelanin, which is effective at absorbing ultraviolet radiation (UV) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), [7] Polymorphisms at the MC1R gene, as are found in individuals with red hair and fair skin, lead to less cAMP synthesis and are associated with production of red/yellow pheomelanin, which has weak photoshielding capacity relative to eumelanin and can lead to the generation of ROS.[8] Thus, decreased MC1R/cAMP signalling may be associated with increased melanoma risk and elevated cAMP levels would be expected to prevent melanomagenesis.[9] In agreement with this hypothesis, a meta-analysis found that MC1R mutations, in addition to affecting pigmentary pathways, may also play a role in melanomagenesis.[10] As a further confirmation that loss of MC1R activity enhances melanomagenesis, one study found that in mice carrying an inactivating mutation in the MC1R gene (a model for the human red hair/fair skin phenotype) which limited the epidermis to only pheomelanin synthesis supported melanomagenesis via pheomelanin-dependent production of oxidative DNA and lipid damage in a UV-independent manner.[11] Since multiple lines of evidence suggest that loss of MC1R activity enhances melanomagenesis, the expectation is that activation of MC1R activity would inhibit melanoma. Consistent with that hypothesis, MC1R activation and subsequent cAMP synthesis directly inhibits melanoma cell proliferation by delaying progression from G2 into M phase via phosphorylation of cdc25B, a cyclin-dependent kinase 1-activating phosphatase.[12]

cAMP-dependent pathways can also inhibit the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, a pathway important for both proliferation and differentiation. The prototypical MAPK pathway is initiated by tyrosine kinase receptor stimulation of small G-proteins (e.g, RAS) followed by the activation of several downstream protein kinases (RAF, MEK and ERK). Three distinct mammalian RAF proteins—ARAF, BRAF and CRAF—each perform a different function, both physiologically and in cancer. In normal melanocytes, BRAF but not CRAF transducers the signal from RAS to MEK because CRAF is inhibited by cAMP–dependent PKA. This inhibitory cAMP pathway is hijacked by melanoma. In RAS-mutated melanoma, CRAF rather than BRAF is utilized to activate MEK/ERK and this switch in RAF utilization is due to a disruption of cAMP signaling, most likely from the activation of PDE4. In other words, a loss of cAMP promotes melanoma growth in RAS-mutated melanoma.[13,14] In another example, in NRAS mutated melanoma, reactivation of the cAMP pathway can inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of tumour cells[15] and in human oral malignant melanoma cells, inhibition of PDE2A2 (the only PDE splice variant in these cells), and subsequent elevation of cAMP levels, results in inhibition of DNA synthesis and reduction of cell proliferation (via G2/M checkpoint arrest).[16] The importance of cAMP signalling in promoting melanoma growth suggests this pathway may be a therapeutic target for melanoma.[17]

There are multiple mechanisms aside from CRAF/BRAF switching in which cAMP via activation of PKA can suppress melanoma growth. PKA has multiple distinct functions in the cell due to its varied localization. PKA is composed of four subunits, two catalytic and two regulatory (R1 and R2). PKA is targeted to different areas of the cell by binding of the regulatory subunit to a class of proteins called A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), which are present throughout the cell in different organelles. R1 containing PKAs tend to influence cell proliferation, while R2 PKAs are mostly involved in differentiation. Human melanomas express an altered ratio of the two types of PKA regulatory subunits, with higher-than-normal levels of R1 as compared to R2. Restoring R2 activity via a R2 subunit selective cAMP analogue led to diminished proliferation and increased apoptosis of melanoma cells.[18]

Finally melanoma with intrinsic resistance to BRAF inhibitors, including BRAFV600E, NRAS mutant, and BRAF wild-type melanomas, often have a deficiency in cAMP synthesis and restoring cAMP levels sensitizes these cells to BRAF inhibitors via PKA-dependent phosphorylation of CRAF.[19]

Evidence supporting the growth of melanoma by cAMP signalling

Contrary to the findings reviewed above, multiple investigators have demonstrated that some melanomas favour elevated cAMP signalling. Some MC1R variants found in melanoma cells are associated with elevated cAMP signalling, through non-canonical pathways, and with cell proliferation.[20] Furthermore, cAMP may play a role in promoting melanoma drug resistance. Garraway and colleagues recently demonstrated that of 110 genes identified as conferring resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors, GPCRs, the adenylyl cyclase gene ADCY9, and the catalytic subunit of PKA alpha were identified as conferring resistance to all MAPK-pathway inhibitors examined. Taken together, these findings suggest that signalling through GPCRs and activation of the AC-cAMP-PKA axis may confer resistance to MAPK inhibitors in melanoma. Expression of transcription factors downstream of the MAPK and cAMP pathways (e.g. microphtalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF)) resulted in resistance. Treatment with a combination of MAPK-pathway and histone deacetylase inhibitors suppressed cAMP-mediated resistance and MITF expression.[21] MITF amplification can be more prevalent in metastatic melanoma as compared to local disease, and is correlated with decreased overall patient survival. Reduction of MITF activity can sensitize melanoma cells to chemotherapeutic agents.[22] Despite its role in promoting proliferation, transformation and metastasis, however, the role of MITF in invasion is unclear; it has shown to both promote and inhibit invasion.[23,24]

Beyond melanomagenesis and drug resistance, cAMP signalling is associated with melanoma invasion and metastasis. Activation of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), a known target of PKA, can promote metastasis by down-regulating cysteine-rich protein 61 (CCN1/CYR61), an extracellular matrix-associated protein that can regulate a variety of cellular activities, including adhesion, motility, survival, proliferation and angiogenesis. [25]

Finally, Calipel and colleagues demonstrated that inhibition or deletion of PKA reduced BRAF activity, ERK1/2 signalling, and cell proliferation in BRAF wild type uveal melanoma cells but did not affect BRAF mutant uveal melanoma cells. This finding suggests that PKA and thus cAMP may have a key role in promoting BRAF/ERK signalling in BRAF wild type uveal melanoma cell growth. [26]

Discussion

The authors have referenced some of their own studies in this review.  The protocols of these studies have been approved by the relevant ethics committees related to the institution in which they were performed.

The role of cAMP signalling in melanoma is more complex than once thought. One explanation for how this second messenger seemingly has multiple disparate cellular functions is that cAMP microdomains consisting of AC, PKA, and PDE resides in multiple distinct locations throughout the cell and respond to their own unique upstream activators.[27,28,29] While inhibition of specific isoforms of PDE may result in cAMP elevation, the downstream effects will vary widely depending on the microdomain in which this elevation has occurred. Variations in site of tumour origin, melanoma cell genotype, and site of metastasis may also play a role. For example, cAMP may function differently in the course of melanomagenesis than it does in the development of resistance after therapeutic pressure has been exerted, or during metastasis.

Conclusion

Further research is warranted to elucidate the impact of contextual cues and intrinsic cell type differences on the role of cAMP signalling in melanomagenesis to help identify new therapeutic targets.

Conflict of interests

None declared.

Competing interests

JH Zippin is a founder of CEPBiotech which commercializes antibodies directed against the soluble adenylyl cyclase.

References

1. Zippin JH, Chen Y, Straub SG, Hess KC, Diaz A, Lee D, et al. CO2/HCOFormula- and Calcium-regulated Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase as a Physiological ATP Sensor. J Biol Chem. 2013 Nov 15;288(46):33283–91.

2. Chang J-C, Oude-Elferink RPJ. Role of the bicarbonate-responsive soluble adenylyl cyclase in pH sensing and metabolic regulation. Front Physiol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Mar 24];5.

3. Espiard S, Bertherat J. Carney Complex. In: Stratakis CA, editor. Frontiers of Hormone Research [Internet]. Basel: S. KARGER AG; 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 24]. p. 50–62.

4. Kim IS, Kim ER, Nam HJ, Chin MO, Moon YH, Oh MR, et al. Activating mutation of GS alpha in McCune-Albright syndrome causes skin pigmentation by tyrosinase gene activation on affected melanocytes. Horm Res. 1999;52(5):235–40.

5. Faucz FR, Horvath A, Rothenbuhler A, Almeida MQ, Libé R, Raffin-Sanson ML, Bertherat J, Carraro DM, Soares FA, Molina Gde C, Campos AH, Alexandre RB, Bendhack ML, Nesterova M, Stratakis CA. Phosphodiesterase 11A (PDE11A) genetic variants may increase susceptibility to prostatic cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):E135-40.

6. Horvath A, Korde L, Greene MH, Libe R, Osorio P, Faucz FR, et al. Functional Phosphodiesterase 11A Mutations May Modify the Risk of Familial and Bilateral Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;69(13):5301–6.

7. Mitra D, Luo X, Morgan A, Wang J, Hoang MP, Lo J, et al. An ultraviolet-radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background. Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):449-53.

8. Mitra D, Luo X, Morgan A, Wang J, Hoang MP, Lo J, et al. An ultraviolet-radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background. Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):449-53.

9. Mitra D, Luo X, Morgan A, Wang J, Hoang MP, Lo J, et al. An ultraviolet-radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background. Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):449-53.

10. Raimondi S, Sera F, Gandini S, Iodice S, Caini S, Maisonneuve P, et al. MC1R variants, melanoma and red hair color phenotype: A meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;122(12):2753–60.

11. Mitra D, Luo X, Morgan A, Wang J, Hoang MP, Lo J, et al. An ultraviolet radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background. Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):449-53.

12. Lyons J, Bastian BC, McCormick F. MC1R and cAMP signaling inhibit cdc25B activity and delay cell cycle progression in melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013 Aug 1;110(34):13845–50.

13. Dumaz N, Hayward R, Martin J, Ogilvie L, Hedley D, Curtin JA, Bastian BC, Springer C, Marais R. In melanoma, RAS mutations are accompanied by switching signaling from BRAF to CRAF and disrupted cyclic AMP signaling. Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 1;66(19):9483-91.

14. Dumaz N. (2011) Mechanism of RAF isoform switching induced by oncogenic RAS in melanoma. Small GTPases, 2, 289-292. 2011 Sep-Oct; 2(5): 289–292.

15. Marquette A, André J, Bagot M, Bensussan A, Dumaz N. ERK and PDE4 cooperate to induce RAF isoform switching in melanoma. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Apr 10;18(5):584–91.

16. Morita H. Characterization of phosphodiesterase 2A in human malignant melanoma PMP cells. Oncol Rep [Internet]. 2013 Jan 31 [cited 2014 Feb 24].

17. Watanabe Y, Murata T, Shimizu K, Morita H, Inui M, Tagawa T. Phosphodiesterase 4 regulates the migration of B16-F10 melanoma cells. Exp Ther Med. 2012 Aug;4(2):205–10.

18. Mantovani G, Bondioni S, Lania AG, Rodolfo M, Peverelli E, Polentarutti N, et al. High expression of PKA regulatory subunit 1A protein is related to proliferation of human melanoma cells. Oncogene. 2008 Mar 20;27(13):1834–43.

19. Krayem M, Journe F, Wiedig M, Morandini R, Sales F, Awada A, et al. Prominent role of cyclic adenosine monophosphate signalling pathway in the sensitivity of WTBRAF/WTNRAS melanoma cells to vemurafenib. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2014 Feb [cited 2014 Feb 26].

20. Newton RA, Smit SE, Barnes CC, Pedley J, Parsons PG, Sturm RA. Activation of the cAMP pathway by variant human MC1R alleles expressed in HEK and in melanoma cells. Peptides. 2005 Oct;26(10):1818–24.

21. Johannessen CM, Johnson LA, Piccioni F, Townes A, Frederick DT, Donahue MK, et al. A melanocyte lineage program confers resistance to MAP kinase pathway inhibition. Nature. 2013 Nov 3;504(7478):138–42.

22. Garraway LA, Widlund HR, Rubin MA, Getz G, Berger AJ, Ramaswamy S, et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):117–22.

23. Javelaud D, Alexaki V-I, Pierrat M-J, Hoek KS, Dennler S, Van Kempen L, et al. GLI2 and M-MITF transcription factors control exclusive gene expression programs and inversely regulate invasion in human melanoma cells: Antagonistic roles of GLI2 and M-MITF in melanoma cells. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011 Oct;24(5):932–43.

24. Pierrat M-J, Marsaud V, Mauviel A, Javelaud D. Expression of Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor (MITF), Which Is Critical for Melanoma Progression, Is Inhibited by Both Transcription Factor GLI2 and Transforming Growth Factor-. J Biol Chem. 2012 Apr 11;287(22):17996–8004.

    Licensee to OAPL (UK) 2014. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)
    Keywords